The Guns & Ammo Network



SIG’s New Soldier: SIG Sauer SIG551-A1 Review

SIG551-A1_001

The SIG551-A1 is a tough, reliable and accurate 5.56x45 carbine, although Fortier found it a bit sluggish to handle due to the weight.

While seen by few and shot by even fewer, the commercial semi-auto version of the SG550 rifle stimulated a great deal of interest among American collectors. Imported in very small numbers, specimens ran upwards of $7,000 when offered for sale. Many waxed eloquent regarding its build quality and accuracy. Some claimed the military Sturmgewehr 90 it was derived from was the finest assault rifle fielded. Collectors champed at the bit to get their hands on one.

When SIG introduced its SIG556 rifle, many purists turned their noses up at it. They didn’t want a version molested to the point of accepting AR mags. No, only a 550 pattern rifle would do. Well, after years of waiting SIG Sauer has finally responded with the introduction of its SIG551-A1.

SIG first began development of 5.56×45 assault rifles in the late 1960s. The SG541 was initially adopted by the Swiss Army in 1983, but funds were diverted for the purchase of armored vehicles instead. When funds became available the SG541 had evolved into the SG550, and this improved model was adopted as the Sturmgewehr Modell 90. Developed as a replacement for the obese but accurate 7.5×55 Stgw. 57, the Stgw. 90 was a much more practical design. A lighter and handier gas-operated assault rifle, it sported synthetic furniture and a folding stock.

In place of the odd blowback action of its previous design, SIG developed a gas-operated system. The heart of this is a rotating bolt and carrier assembly pirated directly from Kalashnikov’s Avtomat series. Unlike the Russian design, though, the SIG’s gas system is adjustable to allow an operator to compensate for a dirty weapon.

Magazines rocked in like an AKs, and the controls were similar. However an improved safety was added, along with a bolt release. The 5.56×45 SG550/Stgw. 90 earned a reputation for its build quality, accuracy and reliability.

The new SIG551-A1 looks like a 550 series rifle, but it is not an exact copy. Like the original it sports ambidextrous safety levers, paddle magazine release, synthetic furniture and a side-folding stock. The bolt handle is on the right side, and there is a rubber seal through which it passes to help keep debris out of the action.

In addition, the trigger guard may be rotated out of the way for cold weather use with mittens. A MIL STD 1913 rail runs along the top of the upper, facilitating easy mounting of optics. Sights consist of an overly complex diopter rear sight adjustable to 300 meters and a protected post front sight.

Feed is from flimsy-feeling translucent 20- and 30-round magazines that are designed to clip together. The 30-round design weighs 3.5 ounces empty.

The barrel is 16 inches long, sports a 1:7 inch twist and is fitted with a flash suppressor. Putting a tape to it rather than going by the company’s literature I found it to be 36.5 inches long with the stock extended and 28.5 inches with the stock folded. SIG Sauer claims this model to weigh seven pounds without magazine, but my review sample tipped the scales at a much heavier 7.9 pounds.

In years past I lived a relatively short drive from SIGarms Academy and trained there regularly. Due to this I had frequent opportunities to train with and test fire selective fire 550 series rifles and carbines. I also had the chance to compare them head to head with a variety of competing designs.

Frankly, after playing with one I never understood the hoopla concerning this series of rifles. Interesting due to its rarity? Yes. Accurate and reliable? Yes. A significant improvement over a rack grade 5.45×39 AK-74M regarding reliability, durability, range, penetration, terminal performance, exterior ballistics or hit probability? Not hardly.

So I was interested to see how the new SIG551-A1 would stack up. Out of the box it looked very good. Build quality appeared first rate with nice looking machining and a handsome finish.

The action operated smoothly, but the safety was a bit stiff, which is pretty typical for a 550 series rifle. I found the trigger mushy but certainly usable.

Magazines inserted and locked into place smoothly without fuss. Balance point is right around the front pivot pin. With a loaded weight of around nine pounds, this model is a bit heavier than I would prefer.

Accuracy of the SIG551-A1 was quite good when put to work from the bench. Mated to a 1-4X scope the SIG delivered consistent groups at 100 yards. The SIG 551-A1 performed especially well when teamed with match-grade ammunition. Firing from the prone position gave consistent hits on a LaRue sniper target at 300 yards.

Running the 551-A1 through drills inside 50 yards revealed it to be a bit sluggish due to its weight. Controllability was good rifle for a rifle with a flash suppressor, but it was nothing to write home about. Reliability was flawless, even with Wolf steel-case ammunition.

SIG551-A1_002

Click to enlarge.

SIG Sauer’s new SIG551-A1 is both extremely robust and reliable. Its best features are how simple, tough and accurate it is. Basically it has all the virtues of Kalashnikov’s Avtomat with a bit of refinement.

However, this isn’t 1984. If compared to more modern designs such as FNH’s SCAR, Bushmaster’s ACR or Robinson Armament’s XCR, it looks dated. Neither is it inexpensive with an suggested retail of $1,986. Still, if you have the AR-15 blahs and are looking for a very tough and reliable 5.56×45 rifle, SIG Sauer’s SIG551-A1 is one to consider.

  • bhp9

    If it had a longer barrel say at least 18 inches I could get interested in it but its short 16 inch barrel really takes the fire out of the 5.56mm. I do not like the cheap plasticky mags either. When you pay that much for a weapon you do not expect to get junk magazines with it.

  • Starky

    Would like to see better results in the accuracy department. Not a group under an inch and 3 inches plus is not at all acceptable for any rifle. I don't think it is overly out of line to expect a $2,000.00 rifle to perform better.

  • chris

    I have both the 556 Patrol rifle with swiss side folder. The gun was missig the rear sight s I was able to buy it for under 800. Also have a new 551-1A1 which I paid 1400 for. The pastilc.. mags on the 551 are actually the same ones used on the real Swiss examples . They fit together easily without any additional couplers or hardhware. From all accounts, they are very robust and exceed the quality og many AR/M4 type magazines. I shot several groups averaging around .750 inch at 50 yards with the factory diopter sights just goofing around trying to get the rifle shooting on the paper. I plan to rob my 4 x 32 ACOG from my bushmaster and try it on the 551. I would expect groups under 1" with proper optics The 556 will shoot just over an inch at 100 yds with ny vortex red/greeen dotscope using the 2x multiplier. Set up for glose quarter defense. I would expect better results with a crosshair or ACOG type scope reticle. Ammo was a mixture of LC 62 grain green tip and federal match hollow point-not sure about bullett wt on the federal. Just shooting up some loose ammo that I wanted to dispose of.

    IMHO the 551 is a better gun in terms of construction and accuracy. I have a SCAR, also several Colts and Bushmasters with optics. Kinda bored with the other stuff,the Sig stuff is now cheap enough to play with and modify-then sell if they are not your thing. Having shot most of them, I think that the SCAR 308 comes out on top as a portable Battle rifle with tolerable carrying weight and firepower that will defeat a vehicle or a house without costing ten grand

  • kent payne

    never have been a fan of sig but all guns are like ice cream some people like different flavors they are for the most part they all work good

  • http://twitter.com/Lakan_Kildap @Lakan_Kildap

    The SCAR and ACR are basically evolved AR-18's. They use the 7-lug Melvin Johnson/Eugene Stoner bolt that requires the highest grade steel (Carpenter 158 for the AR, for example) and meticulous cleaning.

    The SIG and the Robarms XCR use larger lugs. All else equal, these are tougher. The Robinson's XCR needs a bigger company to not only finance its continued production in this economy but also promote the firearm and increase its chances at selections. And not just in the US. As LMT showed us with the L129A1 and H&K with the 416, it's possible to get small, but prestige-building contracts with Allies like Britain, Australia, etc.

    Allan Zitta's LR-300 (aka Para TTR) also needs the same backing. Too good a design to die. Yes, it's a modified AR, but it represents the best that DI can be.

  • Charles

    I just love the idea of a folding stock. I'll get one if I find it on sale.

  • Richard

    Just bought one of these and test fired it 2 days ago and love it. Not your traditional ar look to it but fun to shoot.as far as some of these other comments about accuracy I thought it shot very well with open sights. The trigger adjustment needs some getting used to but that will come with more practice. Little disappointed in the plastic mags but it is what is. I held other ar's that felt light and cheap. Sig makes a reliable and well built rifle that anyone looking to buy an assault rifle would be more than pleased.

  • jeff

    I just purchased this rifle last weekend, but have not had the chance to fire it. I love Sig products, and think they have a high quality standard. The fit and finish of this rifle appears very nice, nothing loose or rattling. Mine came with a hard case, 3 mags, and a red dot sight, installed by the gun shop. I think if you are concerned about the weight, you need to hit the gym. This will be a great sporting rifle for my use, and I am sure I will own it for years.

  • Steve

    I also just recently purchased a Sig 551-A1..I love the build quality of Sig firearms and the reliability. As always, I do a lot of research before buying, and I couldn't find a single negative remark (that mattered) about the Sig ARs…I was a little aprehensive about the plastic mags, but after holding them and handling them, they're tough and just fine. The big plus being that they all securely hook together with built-in fasteners. The stock folds/unfolds very easy, especially when compared to the FN SCAR, which I also love. However, when comparing the two, the price of the SCAR is a big turn-off, about $800-$1000 more. This for a rifle that shoots just as well and isn't as dang loud. The weight is nothing to cry about, so subtle I never noticed it…like Jeff above said, maybe you've become weak if 1/2 lbs bothers you. The stock, while not collapsible, has a great fit and is padded. You can also purchase rails from Sig that will fit under and on the sides for accessories such as a handle or lazer, light, etc…who needs a quadrail?! Anyone considering this weapon, will not be sorry with their purchase.