The Guns & Ammo Network



Ruger 10/22 Takedown Review

Ruger-10-22-Takedown_001

Ruger has just introduced its 10/22 Takedown, which breaks down into two sections that fit perfectly in a supplied ballistic nylon backpack-style case. With the 10/22 in production now for decades, it was a natural choice to not only improve this design but also add yet another variation to the line.

I contacted Ruger to see exactly what went into the design and final production of this 10/22 Takedown. Ruger’s Mark Gurney told me Todd Wilkinson, the company’s chief engineer for rifles, was the driving force behind this project. Mark went on to tell me that the primary concern with any takedown rifle was the sighting system and its ability to return to zero time after time. He said he and Wilkinson were confident that most any system could be made to return to zero when using barrel-mounted iron sights, much like on the present Model 10/22, but they were unsure about how a  receiver-mounted sight system would work.

Wilkinson designed a new lockup system that is “rock solid,” according to Gurney, and came up with an adjustment knob (more on this in a second) that’s engineered for both engineering tolerances and eventual wear.

How does it work? After unpacking the receiver and barrel components, lock the bolt open, remove the magazine and check for live ammunition. Loosen the aforementioned adjustment knob by turning it to the right (clockwise as viewed from the bolt face) as far as possible.

Insert the barrel assembly by first turning it to the right to about 45 degrees with a moderate amount of inward pressure after insertion. Now rotate it to the left (clockwise) until it locks in place. Finally, tighten the adjustment knob by turning it counterclockwise as far as possible with finger pressure.

To remove the barrel, first lock the bolt back and ensure the gun is unloaded. Then push the locking lever forward (under the fore-end) to unlock the barrel while turning it in a counterclockwise direction, pulling it out and away from the receiver.

Other than the takedown feature, the new 10/22 remains the same in other respects. The cross-bolt safety is located forward of the trigger guard and is set up for right-handed shooters. The bolt lock is located under the gun forward of the safety. Trigger pull broke at six pounds with a bit of slack before the sear let go.

The synthetic stock features nicely executed checkering patterns on the fore-end and pistol grip. It has a curved, checkered buttplate that does not slip on your shoulder. However, it lacks sling swivel studs, which would be a help for carrying in the field.

The furnished 10-round rotary magazine fits neatly into a recess forward of the trigger assembly and drops by pusing forward on the magazine release.

For my tests, I used the supplied Ruger base and attached a Leupold Air Rifle 3-9×33 scope that features objective lens parallax adjustment down to 15 yards, which is a great aid for small game hunting and plinking with a rimfire.

Naturally, the proof of any takedown rifle is its ability to shoot consistent groups no matter how many times the barrel is taken off and replaced. After firing the standard accuracy protocol, I shot 10 rounds with CCI Mini Mags—removing and replacing the barrel after each shot. I followed Gurney’s advice and dry-cycled the bolt a couple times after assembly, a procedure that helps seat the barrel. The group was impressive, with 10 shots going into a group that measured 0.75 inch at 50 yards.

Then I took the Remington Standard Target load and this time fired five shots with the barrel removed after each shot. The result was a half-inch group at 50 yards, and I found that the gun actually shot better the more I attached and detached the barrel, which speaks well for the lockup system.

Ruger engineers have certainly done their homework in coming up with a viable takedown rifle that will be dependable in the field in every way. With a price point under $400 and accuracy to boot, I can’t see any reason not to add this gun to your small game hunting battery or as a camp/truck or survival gun.

Ruger-10-22-Takedown_002

The rifle features stainless steel barrel and receiver and a synthetic stock with nicely executed checkering in the pistol grip and fore-end.

  • Jim Rice

    The only negative thing I noticed is that the fold-down rear sights are not high enough to clear the weaver rail when it's installed. I solved this by changing out the sights for a higher Ruger 77/22 version (front and back), meaning that Ruger itself could easily fix this. Also I thought the trigger was heavy and gritty. Replaced it with a Volquartsen. Still, it's a bit disappointing that Ruger can't make a nicer trigger for a gun it's been making since 1964.

    • tonebone

      I agree. Heavy and gritty. And reassembly of the bolt, with the binding of the charging handle against the rod & spring ….. kind of a hassle that could be fixed in manufacturing with little to zero cost per unit.

      But, it's a light, fun little plinker. For us older guys with bad eyes, plinking without a scope is limited to 50 feet LOL. Very accurate with a scope out to75-100 yards.

  • Todd Brockel

    As a loyal Ruger customer/owner I agree with Jim, and think that Ruger should maybe consider enhancing the triggers on the 10/22. Ruger could market and sell enhanced trigger versions of the rifle just as they have a wide variety of options on the market now. My Rugers also have Volquartsen parts installed in them. A move like that could definetly boost sales!

  • Harry Sweigart

    How about a bull barrell take down model. I would buy one then for sure.

  • Craig

    Nice rifle,BUT, i like my Browning .22 auto better (more compact , better fit and finish ) picked up brand new for $100 on one of the gun sites

  • Roger

    Love my Take-Down! One of the finest rifles available and the 10/22 is the King of 22 rifles!

  • D57H

    Ruger has added yet another superb element to the 10/22 linup. No one makes innovative weapons like Ruger and the 10/22 Takedown is proof of that. Could there be improvements, sure but as is this gun works and works well just as every Ruger does. If the 10/22 is good enough for our Olympians to use its good enough for this and every other part time shooter. Not many 22 rifles will go down in history as the Best 22 ever built but the 10/22 will and is what all 22 rifles will be judged by!!!

  • C. Hunter

    I had the same problem trying to use the iron sites with the scope mount on. I had a buddy with a machine shop cut a valley in the scope mount so I can see the sites…works great! I don't understand why Ruger did not address that issue.

  • Steve R.

    I agree with previous posts about the trigger on the 10/22, I have the VLEH model w/16.5" HB and Hogue stock. Even though Ruger says this is a target trigger, it leaves a lot to be desired. Have never been happy with the accuracy from this gun either,so I swapped the barrel for a Grn Mtn. 20" stainless and now the rifle shoots 1/2 " or less groups all day at 50yds. and the barrel isn't even broken in completely yet. Planning on installing a Vol. trigger kit for around $50.00 Why doesn't Ruger make their triggers especially on so called target models actually feel and work like a target trigger should? It couldn't possibly add any real production cost to put different springs and bushings into the setup. I've owned some form of Ruger firearms most of my life and have always been very pleased with them except for this rifle.

  • JD Filkins

    I also use a scope as my eyes aren't what they used to be. In the illustration above the scope bell extends past the break, as will most any scope mounted. This has two issues I ran into. First is the front sight can contact the bell while taking down the rifle, even while folded, preventing take down! Second issue is that if the bell extends past the take down break by at little as an inch, you are unable to store the gun in the case provided! Just doesn't fit. I was able to mount a Leupold Mark AR, but not much else would work…

  • Sal

    Great idea and good execution but the rifle is very short. Was this really needed? An updated design improving the trigger and bolt release mechanism would have been a better use of resources.