Guns & Ammo Network


Collapse bottom bar
Subscribe
Rifles

The M2 Springfield

by Ed Timerson   |  September 23rd, 2010 19

A history of the 1903′s rimfire little brother.


In 1957, through the old U.S. government Director of Civilian Marksmanship gun purchasing program, my father bought a Model 1922 M2 .22 caliber Springfield bolt action. He ordered a serviceable rifle, taking his chances on what he would receive. It arrived still packed in the original Springfield Armory storage cosmoline wrappings.

I was just a kid, but I can remember well the difficult job of cleaning up that rifle. I can also remember, after it was cleaned, how elated my father was that he had received what appeared to be an unused, new-condition Springfield .22. It soon proved very accurate and became a family favorite for plinking. That fall I got my first hunting license, and that M2 became my favorite squirrel hunting rifle.

In the late 1970s, after my dad had retired and was selling off many of his rifles, I purchased this Springfield from him, along with the original sales papers and spare parts he had acquired over the years. The rifle is still all original as it came from Springfield Armory. He was happy to keep it in the family, and it is still part of my collection.

In recent years I was struck with a rekindled interested in the history of this model variation of the 1903 Springfield, so I started a new and deeper study of the M2′s history.

The Model 1922 was not Uncle Sam’s first attempt at building a .22 rimfire Springfield. That was actually the U.S. Gallery Rifle Caliber .22 Model 1903, which was introduced in 1907. But it failed because of design problems and corrosive .22 rimfire ammo of the period.

In his book The Rifle In America, Philip B. Sharpe wrote that “[T]he U.S. Gallery Rifle caliber .22 Model 1903 was one of the crudest abortions ever developed by any organization, regardless of the fact it was turned out by Springfield Armory.”

So in 1919, under the direction of Maj. Julian S. Hatcher, with the cooperation of the National Rifle Association, work was started on a newer .22 caliber gallery practice rifle. The goal was to provide an accurate smallbore rifle for school competitions, civilian rifle clubs and sale to NRA members.

The rifle was to be built on a modified 1903 Springfield action. It continued through several test models, with the final design standardized in 1922. It was called the Model of 1922, Cal .22, and was so marked on top of the receiver ring. It had an NRA-style sporting pistol grip stock, with one barrel band and no upper handguard. It was fitted with a checkered steel buttplate.

The front sight was a modified military type, the rear sight a Lyman 48B peep mounted on the rear receiver bridge. The 24-inch barrel had four-groove rifling with a 1:16 twist. The rifle accepted a detachable five-shot magazine, the well for which was designed around the original 1903 floorplate and trigger guard assembly.

The rifles were built at Springfield Armory until 1924, when production stopped for modifications. A little over 2,000 were made.

After modifications and testing, the U.S. Army decided to adopt the rifle, and after that it was made in two versions–one for Army issue, the other for civilian sales.


The author’s rifle is unusual in that its bead front sight is enclosed by a hood. The barrel stamping “4-42” indicates it was made in the final year of manufacture. The M2’s redesigned bottom metal eliminated the M1’s magazine filler block and incorporated a stamped steel guide/push button release.

It was designated U.S. Rifle, Cal .22, M1922M1 and later known as U.S. Rifle, Cal .22, M1. The improved M1 had a new firing mechanism and bolt head, and new five-round magazine that fit flush. The barrel had a slightly larger rifling diameter and smaller chamber with tighter headspace. It was fitted with a Lyman 48C receiver sight, which allowed half-minute adjustments.

The Army issue rifle had a modified military-type “C” sporter stock, while the sales version had an NRA sporter stock. The sales version was also drilled and tapped for scope bases. Final receiver markings were U.S. Springfield Armory, Model 1922M1, Cal .22.

This improved semi-sporter rifle was very accurate and functioned more reliably. These rifles went on sale in 1926. Older 1922 rifles, when returned to the armory for repairs, were fitted with all the new parts and marked M1s by re-stamping the receiver.

In 1932, a second set of improvements was made to the Springfield .22. A new bolt was developed, with adjustable headspace and better extractor. The rear striker was fitted with a large round disk nut. It was serrated on the outer edge for grasping to cock manually. It also acts as a gas deflector in event of a ruptured case.

The trigger guard assembly and magazine mount were redesigned, eliminating the magazine filler block and installing a stamped steel guide/push button release. It was fitted with a new stock with less drop at the heel. It also had a deeply checkered National Match buttplate, without a trap.


While M2 buttplates were deeply serrated, there’s no record of them having a trapdoor–but obviously some did, as evidenced by the author’s gun.

This modified rifle was designated the M2. Receivers were marked “U.S. Springfield Armory, Cal .22, M2.” The new model was not drilled and tapped for scope bases.

Again, when older rifles were returned to the armory for repairs, they were retrofitted with the new parts. 1922 rifle receivers were re-stamped 1922M2, and an “A” was added to the serial number. 1922M1 rifles were re-stamped 1922M11, and a “B” was added to the serial number. This was to prevent a mix-up and duplication in a wide array of serial numbers used.

There were minor changes made to the M2 in later years, but this was the final form and model of this classic Springfield. The rifles were produced into early 1942, with parts made until December 1942.

After World War II, 1942 barrels were used for reconditioning work. Surplus parts, including barrels, bolts, receiver and
stocks, were sold on the surplus market. Records show that between 1933 and 1942, 11,172 M2 rifle were made.

As mentioned earlier, serial numbers showed a wide variation and overlapped between the different models. To try to clear up this confusion, I contacted Richard T. Colton, a historian at the Springfield Armory Museum. His records show my low-numbered receiver to be made in 1904, and he told me many of the early rifles–including the U.S. Gallery Rifle caliber .22 Model 1903–were rebuilt and updated and possibly used to build the 1922 M1 and M2 models.

Luckily, Springfields had a date stamped on the barrel, just behind the front sight. It could indicate when the rifle was manufactured or when this barrel was installed as part of armory reconditioning. My rifle has the date “4–42,” indicating it was built in the final production year.


The M2’s improvements included a new bolt and rear striker that was fitted with a round, serrated disk nut for manual cocking. The rifle sported a Lyman 48C receiver sight.

The model and serial numbers are original, not re-stamped, so I believe this is an original-manufacture M2 rifle. However, my sample rifle has a few variations not mentioned in any of my research. M2 rifles had deeply checkered buttplates with no trapdoor. My rifle has a deeply checkered buttplate, but it has a trapdoor in it, with no storage hole in the stock.

The front sight is a bead sight with a stamped steel hood. Over the years I’ve examined other samples at gun shows and have never seen one with this style of front sight with hood.

The left side of the buttstock has Springfield Armory’s SA stamp in a rectangle. There’s a partial stamp in the pistol grip curve behind the trigger guard that looks like a “P” in a circle. This would be an inspector stamp. The bolt body has a number stamped on its top, with “M2″ stamped back by the bolt handle.

On top of the bolt handle root is stamped “NS,” for nickel steel, and under it, again, the M2 model number. The underside of the bolt body is hand-etched with matching receiver serial number. Along with the date behind the front sight, on the left side of the barrel breach, is stamped “Long Rifle Cart’ge Only.”

There is also a “T” stamp on the breech right side, which I would assume to be another inspector’s stamp. Metal finish is Parkerized, which records show started with the M2. Trigger is typical military double-stage and deeply serrated.

A lot of these rifles have been cut up and sporterized. Years ago it was also popular to modify and rechamber them to .22 Hornet, but if you have one I’d suggest leaving it as it is. The value of an unaltered rifle has gone way up and continues to increase.

Besides, these semi-sporter rifles look good as is and are a joy to shoot. My rifle has been well-maintained and after all these years is still in good shape. It is more accurate than my older eyes can now shoot with peep sights.


Receiver markings indicate the rifle’s receiver was made in 1904 and was later used to produce an M2, as many early Gallery Rifle receivers were.

  • Mike

    I just purchased a Springfield M2, serial number 20069. Can I expect mine to be similar to yours since my serial number is 20069? Can you tell me where to look to find additional information? Thanks.

  • Alex Zirndorff
  • Bob BRUNING

    Help! My Springfield 22 m2 has a S instead of the normal SA marking. What does that stand for?

    bruningbob@hotmail.com

  • Bob BRUNING

    Cancel the question about the S above. Blind man found the A. Great read!
    Bob

  • redd mann

    Where do you reckon a fellow could find a new or almost like new Lyman 48C sight??

  • Alan

    I have three that are similar to yours including the front site hood. They need a good cleaning since they haven't been used in a while. I think they are without modification but am just starting my research. Any tips on dismantle and cleaning? Don't know how to take off the bolt as I just received them from my father-in-law tonight. (6/21/2012).

    • Ayce2

      Flick the ribbed horizontal tab on tthe oppisite side of the bolt handle down and the bolt should just cycle right out.

  • Greg H.

    My 90 year old Dad recently gave me the Springfield M2 he got through the NRA and DCM in 1959, along with all the original paperwork showing it had been shipped from Red River Arsenal in Texarkana, TX. He also got a 16 March 1944 edition of TM 9-280 (Caliber .22 Rifles, All Types) with it. The serial number is 2162, and the barrel date is 1/33. I would be interested in knowing when it was made and if the 1/33 barrel is the original barrel. The bolt that came with it had the rifle serial number electro-penciled across both sections. But, that bolt had a broken extractor, so Dad was able to order a complete bolt body with a good extractor, and also ordered a spare magazine. I gave it a good cleaning when I got it home, and the bore shines like a new penny. The parkerized finish is about 90%, the stock is quite dark, almost black in places, and has a couple of gouges. It shoots great and the action is slick. I zeroed it for 50 yards and have been having a blast shooting it at reactive targets; spinners, clay pigeon racks, soda cans and plastic bottles.

  • Howard

    I recently aquired an original Model 1922, #13XX with a barrel date of 8-22. It was in filthy condition. However it still retains the original extended magazine and double firing pin. It also has a very "sporterized checkered stock and an unkown peep sight that extends behind and is attached to the bolt. The original Lyman sight is long gone. Though the mounting bracket remains on this gun. Once cleaned of rust and dirt, the inside of the barrel shines and rifling is very distinctive. The stock is a beautiful medium walnut with only a very scratches. Last week I zeroed it in at 100 yards and discovered it to be very accurate. Though I was very careful, rust and dirt took it's toll on the barrel finish. Should I leave it as is or refinish the barrel.?

    • http://www.facebook.com/greg.harrod.14 Greg Harrod

      If it's that bad, and it bothers you, I don't think reparkerizing the metal would do it much harm value-wise, but that's just my opinion. Others here may disagree and offer different advice. It's not like it's a Civil War musket, the refinishing of which would be considered by collectors to be a cardinal sin.
      I decided to refinish the almost black stock on my rifle. I stripped it and applied Chestnut Ridge Military Stock Stain to it, and so far have 3 coats of tung oil on it, with at least 2 or more to go. The wood was so dry that it sucked up those first 3 coats like a sponge. It's looking great so far, has a nice grain and even a couple of birds-eye patterns in it.

  • Glenn F

    My uncle gave me a Model 1922 and a copy of the army manual for it. It says not to use high velocity ammo in it. Would it damage the rifle? Or is it just to be more accurate with standard velocity? I sure don't want to damage the rifle, but most ammo on the shelves here are the high velocity.

    • Mike N

      I recently acquired an M2 version with a perfect bore but have yet to shoot it. Would love to see a copy of the manual or find a copy.

    • luvsoldguns

      Glen, I’d like to ask a question or two about that manual Can you call me? Ray 412-580-0900

  • brad

    Hello All, I have a similar gun but not exactly the same. Any info you can share would be greatly appreciated. Mine has U.S. Springfield Armory Cal.22 M2 SN 6xxx on the barrel. Also no trap door on butt plate, although it is heavily checkered. Also, mine does not have finger grooves in fore stock or the metel band on front of stock which I assume is for a sholder strap / lanyard. __Thanks for any help__Brad

  • Patrick

    Requesting a little assistance in locating sight part for lyman 48c sight on M1 Model 1922(looks like the one pictured above). I am specifically searching for the sight screw in piece as seen in the M2 improvements picture. I appreciate any help in locating a purchase of this part. FYI ser# is 1665B. vr Patrick

  • BAR Guy

    Does anyone know how to remove the floor plate on the little M2 magazine?
    I have two and want to get in there and clean and lube them.
    Any help would be appreicated.

  • http://www.facebook.com/greg.harrod.14 Greg Harrod

    TM 9-280 (16 March 1944), Section II, paragraph 9c, page 31 says that the magazine is a permanent assembly and no attempt should be made to take it apart.
    About the best you can do is soak it in degreaser for a day or two if its really grungy, blow it out with canned/compressed air, apply a couple drops of oil to the follower slots and work the follower up and down a few times. As expensive and hard to find as magazines are, they are not worth ruining by trying to disassemble one. Just my .02 worth.

    • BAR Guy

      Hi Greg
      Thank You very much for taking the time to look up the info.
      That is exactly what I will do
      Now I have to run down the manual TM9-280

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SKBFOHNFOZ3RDT5MDB36MFI6BY Otis

    Cool!

back to top