Nearly all shots on big game require the hunter to be steady, but the longer and trickier the shot, the more important stability is.

We had seen this mule deer two days earlier, before the opener, and now we had our chance. The buck was in a hollow to our right. A strand of autumn-yellow aspen lay between us, and the only view of the buck was from a standing position--between waving treetops.

It was the best mule deer I'd had a chance at in more than 20 years, and I wanted him real bad. I had an extending tripod, so I set it up--several times--trying to find a window through the treetops. The buck and a smaller male were totally oblivious, just feeding along. The range was 290 yards, a long shot on sticks. Two or three times I had a clear presentation, but I couldn't get the shot off before he walked out of the window.

An essential early step in field shooting is going--or getting--steady. But no matter how hard I tried, I couldn't do it. After several minutes of moving the sticks, looking for the next open opportunity, the buck walked behind tall aspens and was gone.

I thought he was gone forever--a lost opportunity I would long remember--and then came a reprieve. Just after he dropped out of sight, the wind settled for the first time that day. We slipped up to the head of the strand of aspens so we could look into the basin, and with light fading fast I spotted him.

Now the range was just 230 yards. I set the tripod low, and propped my plump daypack as a support for my non-shooting elbow. This time I went completely steady, and when the big buck stepped clear of his little buddy I took the quartering-away shot. He made a few steps and fell over.

Without question I was fortunate to get a second chance. So was I incredibly wise to pass an uncertain shot--or did I just plain fail to get steady enough when perhaps I could have? I'll never know, but I am convinced that it's far better to pass than to take any shot you aren't certain of.

Misses are going to happen even when conditions are perfect. Game animals have lots of air space around them and, unfortunately, non-vital zones are much larger than vital zones. If you take risky shots--shots that you aren't certain of or when you aren't quite steady enough--then all potential errors are compounded.

While standing on tiptoes trying to shoot that mule deer, I nearly got off a shot several times. Perhaps I could have, but every time I was steady enough the presentation was wrong--and vice versa.

Up to that point, my hunting year had held some incredible highs and lows, and had we not gotten a second chance, my toe dance on that ridge would have been one of the latter. I had done some of the better shooting of my career--and some of the worst.

Some good ones: In March, I pasted a Derby eland perfectly, a difficult shot after a very long and very hot day. In June, I made a brilliant shot at a kudu on a far ridge.

In late October, in fading light, I made a perfect downhill shot on a Spanish ibex. A few days later, in blowing snow, I made the same shot on a Carpathian chamois.

What these shots had in common, and this is important, is that each time I was able to get steady quickly--and within a few seconds the animals stood with reasonable presentation.