RifleShooter Magazine
 
advertisement
 
HOME /// Rifle Shooter Shooting Tips /// Midrange Misses
Related Stories
>> In Their Tracks
>> Oops!
>> Shoot "Like a Man"
>> Let It Rain
>> Hunting vs. Shooting: Is There A Difference
 

New Rifle Roundup!
A review of the newest in hunting rifles.

>> Plezier Mauser
>> Accurate At Last
>> Semiauto Sniper
>> The 7mm STW Story
 
North American Whitetail
North American Whitetail
A magazine designed for the serious trophy-deer hunter.[+] MORE
>> Petersen's Hunting
>> Petersen's Bowhunting
>> Wildfowl
>> Gun Dog
 
Shallow Water Angler
Shallow Water Angler
The nation's only publication dedicated to inshore fishing, covering waters from Texas to Maine. [+] MORE
>> In-Fisherman
>> Florida Sportsman
>> Fly Fisherman
>> Game & Fish
>> Walleye In-Sider
 
Guns & Ammo
Guns & Ammo
The preeminent firearms magazine: Hunting, shooting, cowboy action, reviews, technical material and more. [+] MORE
>> Shooting Times
>> RifleShooter
>> Handguns
>> Shotgun News
Midrange Misses
It's the "medium distances" that get to me.

Given a choice, I'm very comfortable shooting over a daypack. It's fast and steady, but it's still important to take time to properly evaluate the shots. There's a fine line between rushing the shot and dithering too long, but I think most of my "midrange misses" come from not taking enough time.

An outfitter friend, Frank Fackovec, e-mailed me just yesterday, attaching a photo of a beautiful 10-point whitetail. I recognized the deer, of course; he was truly exceptional for a Texas Hill Country buck. "We got that buck you shot at just the other day, not a half-mile from where you saw him."

Thank goodness! I'd love to have gotten him, but I'm really glad somebody did. I remember him so clearly, standing on a low mesquite ridge at about 260 yards. I was lying on a rock outcropping, resting over my daypack, and I just plain missed him.

Except, I'm ashamed to say, I didn't miss him. I knew I'd hit him, and the video camera we had running confirmed it: low and too far back. Frank's e-mail confirmed what we'd suspected--not only a bad hit but poor bullet performance: lack of expansion, with just a pinprick in and out.


continue article
 
 

We'd suspected this not only from the video, which showed the angle of the bullet impacting behind the deer, but also from the fact that we'd searched for hours and failed to turn up a single drop of blood. He'd vanished over the ridge, and we had no idea where to look. Two weeks later, he was spotted, seemingly unhurt, by another hunter who had done a much better job than I had.

Honest, guys, I don't miss very often. But it does happen, and please don't write in to say it has never happened to you. Stick around, keep hunting, and I can assure you it will happen sooner or later. It can happen at all ranges, from point-blank to very far, and at any time--often when you least expect it. For me, I can honestly say that in nearly 40 years of very active hunting, I've missed very few close shots and only one or two genuine long shots. Although there's really no such thing as an easy shot on game, close shots should be the easiest, with the greatest risks coming from overconfidence and/or rushing the shot.

Long shots should be the most difficult, and technically, they are. Way out there you must contend with genuine challenges like doping the wind and precisely judging the holdover required. Even so, I've been very successful at long-range shooting. This is at least partly because I have an ingrained horror of long-range shots at game. I don't try them unless I'm very steady, have plenty of time to figure the hold and feel really good about the shot.

Perhaps oddly, if I'm going to miss a shot, it's most likely that the medium distance will get me. Partly, I suppose, the law of averages comes into play. As primarily a western hunter the vast majority of my shots at game occur at middle distances--something over 100 yards but less than 300 yards. Also, as a western hunter, I tend to think of anything less than 100 yards as a very close shot. What I think of as long range probably starts at about 400 yards, but I gotta tell you, I think really hard about attempting any shot beyond 300 yards. If I decide to try it, I probably have it figured and will place the bullet correctly. This is generally also true of medium-range shots, but if I'm gonna miss, that's probably when it will happen.

I'm not sure why this should be, but since missing is clearly if not very bad, certainly counterproductive, it might we worthwhile to figure out why.

It isn't a matter of equipment. Flat-shooting and exceptionally accurate rifles wearing large scopes definitely simplify long-range shooting, but equipment isn't all that important at the middle distances. There are literally dozens of cartridges from 6mm up into the .30s that have all the power you need, and most rifles will provide enough accuracy. Just sight-in a couple inches high at 100 yards, maybe a wee bit higher, and you can hold on hair out to 300 yards. At closer ranges you might want to hold low on the shoulder. Out there a bit you will probably hold high on the shoulder, but you sure don't need to hold off of the animal.

You don't need a specialized scope either. Fixed 4X is plenty of magnification for the distances we're talking about, which means the 3-9X scopes most of us are equipped with today offer an image plenty large enough to shoot at.


page: 1 | 2
 
 

 

Outdoor Offers

 
[FEATURED TITLE]
North American Whitetail North American Whitetall
North American Whitetail is designed for the serious trophy hunter. It provides authoritative coverage of world-class whitetails, the latest approaches to deer management and advanced hunting techniques.

> See the Site
> Subscribe to the magazine


[Recent Features]
>> Getting The Most From Your Stands
>> Trolling for Trophy Bucks
>> Iowa's Legendary World Record Buck
>> Top Velvet Buck by Bow!
>> Biggest Buck Ever?
[ALL TITLES]
 CONTACT || ADVERTISE || MEDIA KIT || JOBS || SUBSCRIBER SERVICES || GIVE A GIFT